From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13017-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 8476 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 06:32:32 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Oct 2000 06:32:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 12338 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2000 06:32:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13017
Received: (qmail 12328 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 06:32:26 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "ZSH workers mailing list" <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: paths vs files tags
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:32:24 +0400
Message-ID: <000d01c038cd$2d2f7570$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


Both are tested in _path_files only and both are used to configure _path_files
behaviour. Are they not redundant?

Just thinking about KISS rule.

-andrej

Have a nice DOS!
B >>