From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4989 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 10:23:33 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 10:23:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12173 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 1999 10:23:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5987 Received: (qmail 12166 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 10:23:01 -0000 From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: PATCH: was RE: PATCH: old lists compstate Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:22:11 +0400 Message-ID: <001101be7a97$2c933d90$21c9ca95@mowp.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-reply-to: <199903301007.MAA07246@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal > > > I just tested (_complete:_match), and am still confused :-) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I do *not* use _menu in this case > > All this should become clear when you remember what I said above: > `_menu' does *not* start menucompletion (in the C-code sense). So the > C-code uses all the options as for normal completion. > All these examples are for "normal C completion" with compconf completer=_complete:_match. So again - why is the third case different? (while you are still here :-) /andrej