From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22254 invoked from network); 28 Jun 1999 10:16:48 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Jun 1999 10:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26073 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 1999 10:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6892 Received: (qmail 26066 invoked from network); 28 Jun 1999 10:16:41 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Peter Stephenson" , "Zsh hackers list" Subject: Feature freeze for 3.1.6? RE: pws-24 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:05:17 +0400 Message-ID: <001201bec14d$b93fc7c0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <9906261456.AA28431@ibmth.df.unipi.it> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > There is nothing major I still think needs doing before releasing 3.1.6, > although various things like the builtin jobs signals saga still probably > need tweaking. I actually suggest feature freeze for this release. Or it is pretty likely that it will never come out :-0 I really think, that 3.1.6 is at least misleading and something like 4.0.0-pre1 would be much more appropriate. The initial aim of 3.1.x was to implement modules, and current 3.1.5-pwsNN set has developed far beyond this. The last think I'd like to be settled is job control ... at least, I expect the clear statement on what does work and what does not work (and what will never work). Apart from that I believe it is pretty ready for public release. /andrej