From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21518 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2000 13:08:15 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Mar 2000 13:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10040 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2000 13:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10022 Received: (qmail 10027 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2000 13:07:55 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: PATCH: wordcode stuff Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:44:11 +0300 Message-ID: <001401bf89c5$2b28f3d0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200003091040.LAA24124@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 > > Ok, I hope this patch makes it work for you (and others who don't have > a gcc). Btw, I think gcc is a probably the best choice we have, > because with other if cc on X accepts it you can't be sure that cc on > Y accepts it, too. And nowadays there are systems without a (real) cc. > GCC was never a C compiler - (without additinal options) it was always a "GNU C" compiler which is just different language sometimes. O.K., I admit I was too eager - but I had too many cases when a good program was so GCC-specific that it made no sense to even try to port it. So, the question - is there any flags that will enable "compatible" mode at least for debug builds? Can we use them? -andrej