From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7578 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 09:39:41 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 09:39:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 21915 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2000 09:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12979 Received: (qmail 21907 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 09:38:51 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: completion widgets in menu selection Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:38:47 +0400 Message-ID: <001601c03430$3868f110$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: <200010120928.LAA30246@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > > Before someone corrects me... of course there is a bit of interaction > with menu completion or selection. Without that you won't be able to > select that all-matches-match. > This is one more reason why I prefer separate widget solution. I am curious if anybody will really use _all_matches as part of regular default completion. > For people who don't really like menu completion but sometimes envy > people that use it, there is the automenu option (and the menu > style). Using menu selection instead of ol' menu completion should > make navigation easier. > Yes, menu selection seems to have spoiled zsh-workers. Should I dig out not-so-old articles about list vs. menu signed "Sven"? :-)) -andrej