From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13461-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 2183 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2001 09:58:07 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 13 Feb 2001 09:58:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 9967 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2001 09:57:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13461
Received: (qmail 9952 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2001 09:57:39 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: RE: More incompatibility :-) RE: PATCH: 3.1.9-dev-8: Re: Word splitting in zsh
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:57:34 +0300
Message-ID: <001601c095a3$63928b10$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <1010213092648.ZM26163@candle.brasslantern.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


>
> They are saved, set, and restored in a small block around the call to
> multsub(), and otherwise referenced only on first entry to paramsubst().
> They have no effect other than to override the current setting of the
> shwordsplit option.  That does mean that
>
> 	print ${=foo+"$(unsetopt shwordsplit;print -l $bar)"}
>
> actually *does* split the value of $bar within the command subst.  Hmm.
>

Yep. That is exactly what I meant. I'm not sure what is current status, but I
always assumed that any flag applies to current value only and not propagates
to nested substitutions. At least this sounds logical.

-andrej