From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13060-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 7581 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2000 07:15:25 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 23 Oct 2000 07:15:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 23732 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2000 07:15:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13060
Received: (qmail 23725 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2000 07:15:19 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "E. Jay Berkenbilt" <ejb@ql.org>
Cc: <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: still confused about completion and matching
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:15:10 +0400
Message-ID: <001701c03cc0$fa7a99a0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-reply-to: <200010202045.QAA13963@soup.ql.org>
Importance: Normal

> >
> >   Good move I say. Well, look at the _arguments, it should be
> >   enough.

Of course, I immediately realized, that there are two completions here. One
for smbclient arguments (command line) and another one for smbclient commands
(that is, inside of interactive session). Can tcsh do the latter? :-))

If you are really motivated, look at the nslookup function and its usage of
zsh/zpty for controlling interactive command. Theoretically, you could
complete remote filenames, print jobs ... I love zsh :-))


-andrej