From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-5794-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 25662 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 09:36:12 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 09:36:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 8 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 1999 09:35:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 5794
Received: (qmail 29995 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 09:35:51 -0000
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <borsenkow.msk@sni.de>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: up-line-or-history and multiline input (was: RE: Debug / cut'n'paste on IRIX)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:31:29 +0300
Message-ID: <001801be6ec6$9b135cf0$21c9ca95@mowp.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <slrn7ei9dg.545.mason@coral.primenet.com.au>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211


I have a feeling, that these two are related ...

Look at this (zsh-3.1.5-pws-12):

bor@itsrm2:~%> for i in 1 2 3 4
for> do
for><up-line-or-history>
   gives
bor@itsrm2:~%> for i in 1 2 3 4
for> do
for> setopt completeinword

That is, when working with multiline input _every_ line is considered the
"first and only" line of input by ZLE.

I find it (and always found) very confusing. Even more, as you can go to
previous line by using backward-char

It is confusing, because when I recall the whole buffer, I *can* use
up-line-or-history as expected.

And it is related to multiline paste because if we treated the input as
multiline, there would probably be no need to call trashzle at all ...

cheers

/andrej