From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3677 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 07:08:03 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 07:08:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1497 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2001 07:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14728 Received: (qmail 1472 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 07:07:45 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "ZSH Workers Mailing List" Subject: Patch/integration policy Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:07:50 +0400 Message-ID: <001801c0ee57$65d8db10$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Now with forked CVS we have to decide - how patches are posted - how patches are integrated. Posting - should patches be posted for both stable and development? Integration - are patch authors responsible for applying them to both branches? Or we designate some person(s) who will maintain stable version and integrate patches fron HEAD while other will continue in HEAD as before? -andrej