From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18683 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1999 08:14:47 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Aug 1999 08:14:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10666 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 1999 08:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7402 Received: (qmail 10659 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1999 08:14:41 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer thoth.mch.sni.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: Un-patch: new pattern matching code Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 12:14:38 +0400 Message-ID: <001901bee23f$395fcfb0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <199908090800.KAA24517@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > > Alignment problems should have been handled, but there could be some > > remaining, particularly on 64-bit architectures which I haven't tried. > > Just for the record: at least the globtest-files work an this Alpha > here. > So far (up to the bug I just found, ${(S)foo//*}) it works here on ReliantUNIX with 64-bit integers. This bug exists om 3.1.6 pure as well and probably is not related to new matching code. This bug probably relates to the fact, that the shortest match is empty. /andrej