From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-6572-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 21638 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1999 13:56:05 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jun 1999 13:56:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 15220 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 1999 13:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 6572
Received: (qmail 15213 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1999 13:55:59 -0000
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <borsenkow.msk@sni.de>
To: "Sven Wischnowsky" <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>,
        <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: More intellegent suffix removing?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:55:16 +0400
Message-ID: <001e01beb348$debda3e0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <199906071141.NAA06881@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

>
> The patch would be the thing below (are there any other characters
> where this would be the right thing?). It looks a bit ugly when this
> happens after typing a `<' or `>', though.
>

Hmm ... as I found recently, at least `<' can quite legitimately be part of
word (<m-n> globbing). What a surprise :-) And is interpreted as such by
zsh; `cat<' is different from `cat <'

/andrej