From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7628 invoked from network); 8 Jul 1999 15:33:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jul 1999 15:33:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14900 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 1999 15:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7048 Received: (qmail 14893 invoked from network); 8 Jul 1999 15:33:08 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "ZSH workers mailing list" Subject: RE: Cannot get incremental-complete-word to work Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 19:32:34 +0400 Message-ID: <001e01bec957$19ca0400$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001c01bec950$c935de70$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal > > itsrm2% ls t > incremental completion... > O.K., I figured this out. Default prompt does not include %u. I think, if i-c-w selects complete-word, it would better set prefix (unless defined) to anything with %u. Related problem is, that in the above case %u would still be empty because ``t'' is the longest unambigous prefix. Again in this case some feedback would really be nice (without it you cannot tell, if word typed so far is still ambiguous or simply does not match anything) > tsrm2% ls tkey= My fault, sorry. Shame on me :-( /andrej