From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27385 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 12:05:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 12:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19399 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 1999 12:04:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5812 Received: (qmail 19391 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 12:04:40 -0000 From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: zsh-3.1.2-pws-12: append slash in cd completion weirdness with globcomplete Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 15:03:54 +0300 Message-ID: <002501be6edb$e5fd79c0$21c9ca95@mowp.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <199903151147.MAA23141@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 > > Are you sure there is no other dir starting with `samba-2.0.3' > reachable through `cdpath'? At least, it works for me. > bor@itsrm2:/tools/src/zsh-3.1.5-pws-12/Completion%> zsh -f itsrm2% fpath=(*(/)) itsrm2% source Core/compinit itsrm2% cdpath=(/tools/src) itsrm2% cd samba-2.0.3/ (after the SECOND TAB) samba-2.0.3/ socks5-v1.0r9/ sudo.v1.5.8p2/ sendmail-8.9.3/ ssh-1.2.26/ itsrm2% setopt globcomplete itsrm2% cd samba-2.0.3 (after the FIRST TAB) samba-2.0.3/ socks5-v1.0r9/ sudo.v1.5.8p2/ sendmail-8.9.3/ ssh-1.2.26/ > > I don't thnik so, at least when we speak about `_path_files' since > that completes only file names and there the slash is not only useful > to have, but it's also the way builtin completion behaves. > Yep. You are right (about the way builtin behaves). > Otherwise, I'd liek to mention my suggestion about `style'-entries in > `compconfig' again. Could you sent a list of all the things the > example functions do that you don't like? That way we could probably > come up with a list of things we'd like to make user-configurable. > Well, in a couple of weeks may be :-) cheers /andrej