From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17217 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2001 12:43:28 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Feb 2001 12:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 278 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2001 12:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13521 Received: (qmail 265 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2001 12:43:21 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: Completion services + xterm auto-margin revisited Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:43:13 +0300 Message-ID: <002a01c09ccd$04fbe660$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200102221202.NAA18489@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > > We came to the conclusion that this has to be handled `globally', not > only for completion lists. Someone said he would have a look and I > promised to merge the things he would come up with with the completion > listing code. Then we never heard about it again. > Hmm ... do you mean 7030, 7034 and related - (interesting are 7053, 7061)? Well, it was a knowhow of Geoff (I still shudder when looking at refresh code). May be somebody else will have enough courage to plunge into it. -andrej