From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-15116-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 1074 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 11:21:26 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 11:21:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 16216 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2001 11:20:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 15116
Received: (qmail 16195 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 11:20:25 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Timo Aaltonen" <tjaalton@cc.hut.fi>
Cc: "ZSH Workers Mailing List" <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject:  AIX - almost success.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:21:01 +0400
Message-ID: <002a01c0fefb$3efe3f30$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.10106271408310.12353-100000@tiku.hut.fi>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006
Importance: Normal

> >
> > > > I'm still interested if other problems are fixed.
> > >
> > > They seem to be, at least it compiled ok. I had to remove
> both termcap and
> > > terminfo.
> > >
> >
> > what about make check?
>
> ./C02cond.ztst: starting.
> Test ./C02cond.ztst failed: bad status 1, expected 0 from:
>   sleep 1
>   cat unmodified
>   touch newnewnew
>   if [[ $OSTYPE == "cygwin" ]]; then
>     print -u8 "Warning: not testing [[ -N file ]] (not supported on
> Cygwin)"
>     true
>   else
>     [[ -N newnewnew && ! -N unmodified ]]
>   fi
> Was testing: -N cond
> ./C02cond.ztst: test failed.
>

That's O.K., you are on NFS.

>
> all the rest went fine
>

Nice. Could you do a favour and try clean configure/make/make check with

LIBS=-ltermcap configure ...

This should work OOTB (by avoiding curses); of course, not with GCC as
usual.

> > > Gcc 2.8.1 specs-file attached, but I have been using cc...
> > >
> >
> > If you can spend some more time, I'd be interested in making it more
> > GCC-friendly.
>
> Ok, that's fine.
>
>
> btw, I tried the same numcodes-test with other OS's (Tru64, linux), and
> they both failed (unresolved symbol numcodes), but maybe that's for a
> reason, as it isn't tested when configure is run normally..
>

What's up? It definitely works on Linux, Sven, do you have numcodes,
boolcodes etc on Tru64?

Timo, could you post exact program, cc invocation and error messages you get
on Linux and Tru64?


-andrej