From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13911-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 29719 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 14:06:17 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Apr 2001 14:06:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 12212 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2001 14:06:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13911
Received: (qmail 12201 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 14:06:11 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: RE: zsh/termcap and zsh/terminfo modules
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:06:05 +0400
Message-ID: <003301c0bdd9$8e1e09a0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010405095812.A18353@dman.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

>
> > Nope. I have both. Is it possible that one of them is linked
> statically? Check
> > for zsh_cv_shared_tgetent and zsh_cv_shared_tigetstr. It may well
> be, tests
> > take some of them wrong.
>
> I have a vague recollection that this has something to do with people
> wanting to link with libtermcap instead of ncurses.
>
>

Probably. Our system in curses-based with termcap emulation so configure finds
both functions. If termcap and terminfo libraries are distinct and you happen
to catch termcap, terminfo won't be found.

-andrej