From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: Completion list is not cleared Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:08:17 +0300 Message-ID: <003f01be4935$52840270$21c9ca95@mowp.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <199901261345.OAA23848@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 Importance: Normal X-Mailing-List: 5018 > > > > itsrm2% pg Makefile <= cursor here > > Makefile MkKernOpts* Mksrc* > > Is the cursor directly after the Makefile or after a space? I have it > after a space, which is certainly the right thing. > After I press TAB the second time and automenu starts, it is directly after Makefile. And I mean the case, when I press SPACE after that, exiting current completion. In this case cursor is after inserted space. > > If you have selfinsert bound to space the behaviour should be the one > zsh always had (I think, I don't exactly remember 3.0.5 and I don't > have it anymore, but a 2.6-beta12 I just found behaves the same). > If you have space bound to magic-space I can understand that you would > like the list to disappear, but at least that 2.6 didn't remove it, > too (although zsh might have behaved differently in 3.0.x). > I must admit, I don't remember, when it changed. I started with late 2.x beta, some time before version number was changed to 3.0.0. I never played with bindkey for space. But I remember my surprise when I first have seen list not disappearing. And I think, I even sent a message to this list at this time ... gotta make a search ... no, sigh ... Hmmm about bindkey ... there was large change in zle by Zefram. May it be, that some default bindings changed at that time? > So, can anyone test how 3.0.5 did this? Should we change it? Did the > behavior change? If yes, was the old way better? > Well, this question actually belongs to zsh-users. I vote for clearing the list :-) /andrej