From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26508 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1999 16:41:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jun 1999 16:41:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 27276 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 1999 16:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6584 Received: (qmail 27269 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1999 16:41:02 -0000 From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Bart Schaefer" , Subject: RE: More intellegent suffix removing? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:40:25 +0400 Message-ID: <004101beb35f$f0738480$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <990610163140.ZM1627@candle.brasslantern.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > I don't want zsh to replace a slash if one was added. What if what I > intend is to complete a directory and then glob files in that directory > whose names begin with a digit? > That was exactly how I found it :-) > I think Andrej's point -- and it's my point, if not his -- is that '<' > should be left out of the list of characters that do suffix autoremoval. > (And therefore probably '>' should be too ... and come to think of it, > even '|' can be part of a glob pattern.) > Well, at least I have a habit to always separate <, > and | by space from previous word if used as redirection/pipe, so yes, may be. But in any case `<' for all-digits name globbing is quite handy once you've started to use it. /andrej