From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <borsenkow.msk@sni.de>
To: "ZSH workers mailing list" <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: PATCH: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: avoid shared library on ReliantUNIX (updated)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:36:47 +0300
Message-ID: <004501be4941$af7b7c40$21c9ca95@mowp.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
Importance: Normal
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk> 5021

This replaces my patch in 4966. I just realised, that we have several
compilers that use different options. This one tries to account for that.

/andrej


--- configure.in.org    Thu Jan 21 12:02:34 1999
+++ configure.in        Tue Jan 26 18:28:20 1999
@@ -1008,9 +1008,24 @@
     aix*)         DLLDFLAGS="${DLLDFLAGS=-G -bexpall -lc}" ;;
     solaris*|sysv4*|esix*) DLLDFLAGS="${DLLDFLAGS=-G}" ;;
   esac
-  case "$host_os" in
-    hpux*)  EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-E}" ;;
-    linux*) EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-rdynamic}" ;;
+  case "$host" in
+    *-hpux*)  EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-E}" ;;
+    *-linux*) EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-rdynamic}" ;;
+    mips-sni-sysv4)
+      #
+      # unfortunately, we have different compilers
+      # that need different flags
+      #
+      sni_cc_version=`$CC -V 2>&1 | head -1`
+      case "$sni_cc_version" in
+        CDS* )
+         EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Blargedynsym}"
+       ;;
+       * )
+         EXTRA_LDFLAGS="${EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-LD-Blargedynsym}"
+       ;;
+      esac
+    ;;
   esac
   AC_CACHE_CHECK(if your dlsym() needs a leading underscore,
    zsh_cv_func_dlsym_needs_underscore,