From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-15284-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 23747 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 11:03:34 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 11:03:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 7548 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2001 11:02:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 15284
Received: (qmail 7530 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 11:02:30 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: RE: RE: Preserve initial // in path name completion
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:03:20 +0400
Message-ID: <005b01c1060b$4451e830$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <200107061041.MAA12536@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006

>
> > ...
> >
> > To my immense surprise even with preserve-prefix unset (but
> with your patch
> > and suitably set fake-files) and squeeze-slashes it happily
> completed inside
> > UNC paths, even respecting all matchers. Looks, like fake-files win?
>
> Err... the patch shouldn't make a difference with the style set, does it
> work without the patch, too? (And with the patch below.)
>

It happily works without the first patch. And the second does fix root$
problem. Wonder ... I guess I never tried it before but I presumed
squeeze-slashes should prevent it.

Can you explain why it works? (I mean, that we can be sure it continues to
work in the future).

-andrej