From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26891 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 22:02:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 2001 22:02:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 15399 invoked by alias); 30 May 2001 22:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14581 Received: (qmail 15387 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 22:02:28 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <010530150208.ZM3863@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:02:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20010530144809.E47866@lizzy.bugworks.com> Comments: In reply to Jos Backus "zsh and autoconf-2.50" (May 30, 2:48pm) References: <20010530144809.E47866@lizzy.bugworks.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: Jos Backus , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 30, 2:48pm, Jos Backus wrote: > Subject: zsh and autoconf-2.50 > This is with a just checked out copy. Am I doing something wrong? I don't think so ... > taiko:/depot/src/zsh% ./Util/preconfig > cd . && ./.preconfig > configure.in:55: error: undefine: undefined: zsh-debug That's pretty silly. This is like C++ generating an error if you #undef a constant that has never been #define'd. Did autoconf-2.50 redefine the m4 undefine function, or did something change in a new version of m4? My m4 info page says: It is not an error for NAME to have no macro definition. In that case, `undefine' does nothing. Anyway, those undefines are probably entirely extraneous anyway, so try just deleting them.