From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6565 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2002 21:20:29 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Jun 2002 21:20:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 23926 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2002 21:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 17342 Received: (qmail 23913 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2002 21:20:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:19:24 -0400 From: Chet Ramey To: jos@catnook.com Subject: Re: posix compliance Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Reply-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu Message-ID: <020620211924.AA92433.SM@nike.ins.cwru.edu> Read-Receipt-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-In-Reply-To: Message from jos@catnook.com of Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:17:33 -0700 (id <20020620191755.GA84784@lizzy.catnook.com>) > Indeed, his argument that things like these were causing them lots of problems > with zsh point to poorly written scripts in the first place. But of course > he's not going to admit that, least of all in public with the bash maintainer > standing next to him. Oh, I wouldn't have minded. There's a lot of crap out there, and shell scripts are no exception. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet) Chet Ramey, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/