From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17586-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 19940 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2002 23:59:13 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Aug 2002 23:59:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 29851 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2002 23:59:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17586
Received: (qmail 29819 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2002 23:59:04 -0000
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <020827165832.ZM6287@candle.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:58:32 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20020827212119.7FBC11C0DD@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
        "Re: Non-patch: Option arguments" (Aug 27, 10:21pm)
References: <20020827212119.7FBC11C0DD@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97)
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Non-patch: Option arguments
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Aug 27, 10:21pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Non-patch: Option arguments
> I wrote:	
> > I've rewritten the option handling for builtins to improve the currently
> > woeful handling of arguments to options.
> 
> I've now committed this.

I was just about to ask you to tag the repository first.  Hmm, maybe I can
tag an appropriate set of revisions from my sandbox, I just updated a few
hours ago ...