* Re: {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete. [not found] <001600c2ab76$ced38003$51514332@ruivcgh.yfw> @ 2003-01-30 21:51 ` Duncan Sinclair 2003-01-31 1:35 ` Mads Martin Joergensen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Duncan Sinclair @ 2003-01-30 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Hi, Did someone say the spam problem had been fixed??? Duncan. On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 03:16 am, <mn90o@aol.com> wrote: > Hey Friend, > > You may have seen this business before and ignored it. I know I did - > many times! However... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete. 2003-01-30 21:51 ` {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete Duncan Sinclair @ 2003-01-31 1:35 ` Mads Martin Joergensen 2003-01-31 7:36 ` Duncan Sinclair 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mads Martin Joergensen @ 2003-01-31 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duncan Sinclair, zsh-workers * Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@dis.strath.ac.uk> [Jan 30. 2003 22:51]: > Hi, > > Did someone say the spam problem had been fixed??? Yes. A spam problem being fixed does not necessarily mean that 100% of the spam is gone. These lists have no spam problem anymore. If you're that sensitive you would probably have to start learning how to spamfilter yourself. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete. 2003-01-31 1:35 ` Mads Martin Joergensen @ 2003-01-31 7:36 ` Duncan Sinclair 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Duncan Sinclair @ 2003-01-31 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mads Martin Joergensen; +Cc: zsh-workers Hi, On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 01:35 am, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > * Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@dis.strath.ac.uk> [Jan 30. 2003 22:51]: >> Hi, >> >> Did someone say the spam problem had been fixed??? > > Yes. A spam problem being fixed does not necessarily mean that 100% of > the spam is gone. These lists have no spam problem anymore. If you're > that sensitive you would probably have to start learning how to > spamfilter yourself. I do have a spam filter - SpamAssassin put the "{SPAM?}" into the subject of the original message for me. SpamAssassin scored the message at 23.5, almost 5 times the score of 5 it needs to flag the message as spam. X-Spamcheck: SpamAssassin (score=23.5, required 5, AS_SEEN_ON, BULK_EMAIL, CASHCASHCASH, COPY_ACCURATELY, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, FINANCIAL, FREE_MONEY, INITIAL_INVEST, JODY, LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2, LINES_OF_YELLING_3, MLM, NOT_INTENDED, NO_REAL_NAME, ONLY_COST, OPT_IN, PARA_A_2_C_OF_1618, READ_TO_END, RISK_FREE, SECTION_301, SENT_IN_COMPLIANCE, SPAM_PHRASE_21_34, SUPERLONG_LINE, USER_AGENT_OE) So I couldn't help wondering why sunsite.dk's spam filter thought the message was OK... Sorry for the noise... Cheers, Duncan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-31 7:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <001600c2ab76$ced38003$51514332@ruivcgh.yfw>
2003-01-30 21:51 ` {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete Duncan Sinclair
2003-01-31 1:35 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2003-01-31 7:36 ` Duncan Sinclair
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).