From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12215 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2006 18:10:51 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Nov 2006 18:10:51 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 19396 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2006 18:10:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 Nov 2006 18:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20049 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2006 18:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 22958 Received: (qmail 20040 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2006 18:10:38 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 Nov 2006 18:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19032 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2006 18:10:38 -0000 Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (206.46.252.44) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 4 Nov 2006 18:10:36 -0000 Received: from torch.brasslantern.com ([71.116.118.106]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0J8700FAXX5MH3J0@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 12:10:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from torch.brasslantern.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA4IAXLX015728 for ; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 10:10:34 -0800 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id kA4IAXfW015727 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 10:10:33 -0800 Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 10:10:33 -0800 From: Bart Schaefer Subject: Re: fg call in function: bug? In-reply-to: <17393e3e0611031857x3673ca28oec66aa06405d2f7d@mail.gmail.com> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Message-id: <061104101033.ZM15726@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <17393e3e0611031639g31c94488m7605a5841a3c9e25@mail.gmail.com> <17393e3e0611031715m7a189c43t46f5b0807490f129@mail.gmail.com> <061103185055.ZM14825@torch.brasslantern.com> <17393e3e0611031856v21f9bc19k9a9f25ff5ef002ba@mail.gmail.com> <17393e3e0611031857x3673ca28oec66aa06405d2f7d@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In reply to "Matt Wozniski" "Re: fg call in function: bug?" (Nov 3, 6:58pm) On Nov 3, 6:58pm, Matt Wozniski wrote: } } If that were the case, wouldn't you expect to see different output } between "jobs" and "{ jobs }"? No ... I believe the code takes a different branch when there is a job number specified as opposed to when it's asked to list all jobs.