From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15108 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2009 15:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27382 Received: (qmail 22871 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 15:07:28 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <091110070713.ZM27784@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:07:13 -0800 In-reply-to: <200911081844.nA8Iii4a003125@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: FEATURES description wrong line" (Nov 8, 6:44pm) References: <200911081844.nA8Iii4a003125@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Zsh-Workers Subject: Re: FEATURES description wrong line MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Nov 8, 6:44pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } > "ls *(om[2]) matches the two most recently modified files" } } Yes, that's not very helpful. I'll change it to... } } + ls *(om[2]) matches the second most recently modified file So we've got two competing patches for this and neither has been checked in yet. Shall I go ahead and put *both* of the examples in FEATURES?