From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8396 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 14:53:20 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 14:53:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16445 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2000 14:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11714 Received: (qmail 16438 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 14:52:53 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 15:52:22 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Subject: Re: Output of 'make check' In-reply-to: "Your message of Thu, 01 Jun 2000 17:03:39 +0400." <000001bfcbc9$ce422690$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Message-id: <0FVH008BTDBAII@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > What about attached patch? (2>/dev/null does not work, diff outputs on > stdout). Looks about the best way of doing it --- we don't want to start mucking with options to different versions of diff. I won't apply it until after the next trial release, just in case it tickles something. > Can we rely on the fact, that $? is set to exit code of command > substitution? Yes, that works in the case that the command substitution is the only thing on the right hand side of an assignment --- normally you don't get it's status, of course. -- Peter Stephenson Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070