Re: PATCH: Re: expansion

[Peter Stephenson <pws@cambridgesiliconradio.com>]

Oliver wrote:
> I also agree with Sven in not being too happy about having different
> defaults depending on whether _expand was used as a completer or called
> from _expand_word as suggested by Bart.

I think it was my suggestion, at least I suggested modifying the defaults
for _expand_word to work the way I expected (which was basically how ^x*
works), and it was simply to avoid having to impact on people who were
happily using _expand.  But if they prefer it to work by default the way
_expand_word was modified to, I'm all the happier.  (I can't parse the
first part of that last sentence any more, so it'll have to do how it is.)

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@cambridgesiliconradio.com>
Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070