From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2824 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 09:05:46 -0000 Received: from ns2.primenet.com.au (HELO primenet.com.au) (?m0+v0g+68YLVy7fDf08HeU7GCSj8ZZ29?@203.24.36.3) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 09:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1723 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2000 18:17:28 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns2.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Jul 2000 18:17:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 20802 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2000 18:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12197 Received: (qmail 20686 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2000 18:17:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 19:16:39 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Subject: Re: completing directory path In-reply-to: "Your message of Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:07:33 -0000." <1000707170733.ZM1398@candle.brasslantern.com> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Message-id: <0FXC00J0TARQE8@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > On Jul 7, 5:12pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } Subject: completing directory path > } > } completion has stopped working on ~1/... etc. > > What are your styles? This works for me. Well, it sort of works; I first > get ~1/ --> ~+1/ and then completion after ~+1/ works as expected. I can reproduce it with completely vanilla new completion, but it's weirder than I said: it only happens when there is a unique match for the file in question (which may explain why I needed to type the first character). This seems to be completely reproducible and as far as I can see not style dependent. It may be related to the fact that the `+' doesn't get inserted in this case. -- Peter Stephenson Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070