From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8179 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 08:53:07 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 08:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21271 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2000 08:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12269 Received: (qmail 21263 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 08:52:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:52:22 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Subject: Re: CVS per-patch flat tags still needed? In-reply-to: "Your message of Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:22:06 PDT." To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Message-id: <0FXU00DDJ3B9WG@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > Do we need all the old per-patch flat tags that the pre-sourceforge > CVS patch-applicator used to generate? I've heard that having a lot > of unused flat tags slows CVS down (presumably when using a tag name), > and since we don't maintain any per-patch tags anymore, it seems to me > that it would be a good idea to just remove them. I'd be glad to do > this, if we agree that this is a desired course of action (at least, > once zsh.sourceforge.net comes back up again). That would be a good idea. I think we can get a long OK with the version tags, the ChangeLog and the mailing list archive. -- Peter Stephenson Cambridge Silicon Radio, Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070