From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26589 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2000 01:33:29 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Jan 2000 01:33:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9902 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2000 01:33:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9471 Received: (qmail 9894 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2000 01:33:23 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000130012744.ZM23760@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 01:27:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Alexandre Duret-Lutz "Re: match again" (Jan 28, 5:47pm) References: <200001281005.LAA20292@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: match again MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 28, 5:47pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: } Subject: Re: match again } } -compstyle '*:options' prefix-hidden yes" } +zstyle '*:options' prefix-hidden yes" (And several similar examples in comments.) These are not equivalent. Is it really correct to change it this way? The actual equivalent of the "compstyle" statement would be zstyle ':completion*:options' prefix-hidden yes While I'm on the topic, should there be a ':' before the '*' in that example? One of the defaults installed by compinit itself comes out like zstyle ':completion*:default' list-colors ... whereas all the others resemble one of zstyle :completion:correct: prompt 'correct to:' or zstyle ':completion:*' verbose yes which makes me wonder if it should be zstyle ':completion:*:default' list-colors ... Clue me on the subtlety, please. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com