From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4931 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2000 16:53:49 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Feb 2000 16:53:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 2780 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2000 16:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9574 Received: (qmail 2772 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2000 16:53:42 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000204165313.ZM8585@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:53:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Zefram "DeCSS" (Feb 4, 10:04am) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Zefram , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: DeCSS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 4, 10:04am, Zefram wrote: } Subject: DeCSS } } mirror the files on ftp.zsh.org. Conveniently, that's outside the } jurisdiction of the US courts. Does anyone see a problem with this plan, } or have strong opinions about whether we should do this? I can't advocate deliberately causing a mirror site -- many of which *are* inside the jurisdiction of the US courts -- to unwittingly make available something that might make them subject to legal action. Much as I'd like to support DeCSS, this sounds more like a way to lose a lot of zsh mirror sites than a way to promote DeCSS. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com