From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4543 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2000 19:15:21 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Feb 2000 19:15:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22651 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2000 19:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9587 Received: (qmail 22641 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2000 19:15:13 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000206191509.ZM11249@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 19:15:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to "Andrej Borsenkow" "RE: 3.1.6-dev-17" (Feb 3, 1:11pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: "Zsh hackers list" Subject: Makefile target given more than once (Re: 3.1.6-dev-17) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 3, 1:11pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: RE: 3.1.6-dev-17 } } gmake[1]: Entering directory `/tools/src/zsh-3.1.6-dev-17/Doc' } Makefile:217: target `zsh.texi' given more than once in the same rule. Hrm. This would appear to be gmake cleverly discovering that when $(sdir) is ".", zsh.texi and $(sdir)/zsh.texi are the same target. Does that actually cause the build to fail, or is it just noise? Can we count on other "make" implementations being that clever? I didn't think so, but ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com