From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25925 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2000 15:59:00 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Feb 2000 15:59:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 24466 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2000 15:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9668 Received: (qmail 24457 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2000 15:58:50 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000210155844.ZM2443@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 15:58:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200002101403.PAA25399@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: yet another completer" (Feb 10, 3:03pm) References: <200002101403.PAA25399@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: yet another completer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 10, 3:03pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: yet another completer } } This almost makes me think that we could actually remove $compmatchers } and leave only the compctl-with-only-`-M' thing for those who still } use compctl. I'd be in favor of this, since I always found compmatchers needlessly confusing. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com