From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9027 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2000 16:35:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Mar 2000 16:35:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 25918 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2000 16:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10062 Received: (qmail 25857 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2000 16:34:49 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000310163401.ZM18825@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:34:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200003101533.QAA08405@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "ksh (with PATCH)" (Mar 10, 4:33pm) References: <200003101533.QAA08405@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: ksh (with PATCH) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 10, 4:33pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: ksh (with PATCH) } } - Two problems with `|&': } - The pipe-code was put in the wrong place. } - SEPERs weren't skipped. You can't trust ksh's tests of |&, can you? It means something entirely different in ksh. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com