From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2670 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 16:50:47 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Mar 2000 16:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14314 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2000 16:50:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10200 Received: (qmail 14301 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 16:50:24 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000322165019.ZM1475@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:50:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20000322150928.A19079@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> Comments: In reply to Ollivier Robert "CVS ?" (Mar 22, 3:09pm) References: <20000322150928.A19079@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: CVS ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 22, 3:09pm, Ollivier Robert wrote: } Subject: CVS ? } } Is there any progress on the Sourceforge front ? Or has anyone started } their own CVS repository ? I thought Adam was waiting for a reply on whether sourceforge was willing to host the sources under the zsh license. Adam? } Will there be snapshots again ? PWS has indicated he'll be starting up again soon. I sent him a list of the patches since -dev-19 (up through article 10168) a couple days ago. I'm now generally of the opinion that we should go ahead with sourceforge if they're OK with the license; initialize it by grabbing Tanaka's CVSROOT with cvsup and worry about the mailing lists later (probably, much later). However, having waited this long, we might as well wait for PWS to give his opinion. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com