From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3219 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 16:52:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Mar 2000 16:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6353 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2000 16:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10299 Received: (qmail 6334 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 16:51:56 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000328165141.ZM19359@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:51:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <000001bf98ab$271ec220$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Comments: In reply to "Andrej Borsenkow" "RE: move to sourceforge.net in progress" (Mar 28, 3:45pm) References: <000001bf98ab$271ec220$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: "zsh workers mailing list" Subject: Re: move to sourceforge.net in progress MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 28, 3:45pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: RE: move to sourceforge.net in progress } } I think, that key developers should work directly with CVS repository. } There is no sense to post patches if everybody is expected to get them } from CVS. I don't like the idea of "everybody is expected to get them from CVS." I occasionally apply patches selectively (thought not so much, lately, as I used to) and it's *very* helpful to be able to point to the mailing list archive when a non-developer asks about a fix for a specific bug. Nevertheless: } What is actually needed is some release engineering - development } branch(es) for Sven to play with ^-) and stable branch(es) for other } mere mortals :)) Here we actually need designated person who should } decide, what goes into stable branch, do merge etc. Yes. Peter should be that person, as long as he's willing/able. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com