From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22082 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2000 17:40:54 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Mar 2000 17:40:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26924 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2000 17:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10318 Received: (qmail 26899 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2000 17:40:40 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000329174034.ZM26680@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:40:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200003290914.LAA22586@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: PATCH: was: Re: endianness of wordcode" (Mar 29, 11:14am) References: <200003290914.LAA22586@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: was: Re: endianness of wordcode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 29, 11:14am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: was: Re: endianness of wordcode } } So, this adds the -a option to zcompile which is needed to make } functions that are currently only marked for autoloading to be written } into the zwc file. If it is not given and there is at least one name } of such a function given, zcompile will return an error (and not write } the zwc file). This is still a bit odd, because it means you have to check yourself whether a function is defined or undefined before you know what result "zcompile -a -c ..." is going to produce. I'd rather that you simply CAN'T compile both defined and undefined functions in the same pass. Anybody else want to weigh in on this? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com