From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5023 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2000 23:30:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Apr 2000 23:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10976 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2000 23:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10397 Received: (qmail 10875 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2000 23:29:53 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000402232919.ZM18476@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:29:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to mason@primenet.com.au (Geoff Wing) "Re: sourceforge.net CVS tree ready for use" (Apr 2, 10:35am) References: <20000401121150.A18158@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> <000201bf9c8b$a6655830$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: sourceforge.net CVS tree ready for use MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 2, 10:35am, Geoff Wing wrote: } Subject: Re: sourceforge.net CVS tree ready for use } } Symbolic names with two numbers (one dot) are names on the main branch } (i.e. static tags). Those with four (or six or eight ...) numbers are } branch tags. However, CVS only assigns new branch numbers when absolutely necessary, so there may be files on the main trunk that have four or more numbers in their revision. IIRC, Tanaka was maintaining his repository entirely as "cvs import"s of a master patch tree. Thus before PWS's commit, every file in the whole repository appeared to be on the "vendor branch." Now, only those files that PWS updated (patches between 10250 and 10376, so far) have trunk revision numbers (mostly 1.2) while the rest still appear to be on the branch (even though you get them with a main trunk checkout). Confused enough yet? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com