From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5844 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 15:48:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Apr 2000 15:48:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19422 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2000 15:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10660 Received: (qmail 19401 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 15:48:11 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000411154806.ZM32056@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:48:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200004110828.KAA03835@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "RE: PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22" (Apr 11, 10:28am) References: <200004110828.KAA03835@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 11, 10:28am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: RE: PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 } } Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } } > The decsription of compstate[insert] : } > } > ... } > will be inserted into the command line. It may also be set } > to a string of the form `GROUP:MATCH' which specifies a match } > from a group of matches to be inserted, counting from 1 } > upwards (e.g. `2:4' specifies the fourth match of the second } > group). Negative numbers count backward from the last match } > ... etc and the next paragraph } } So, I would like to make the question: should we remove it? I would } only comment it out in the C-code just in case we get a way to access } matches added some day (not for a long time, I think). I think either remove it, or fix the doc, e.g. break the description of it out into another paragraph and mention that the completion system doesn't actually use it yet. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com