From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16293 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 08:12:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 08:12:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 22460 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2000 08:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10684 Received: (qmail 22444 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 08:12:45 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000412081220.ZM11853@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:12:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to mason@primenet.com.au (Geoff Wing) "Re: 3.1.6-dev-22" (Apr 12, 6:30am) References: ""Bart Schaefer""'s message of "Sun 09 Apr 2000 21:22:19 -0000." X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: mason@primenet.com.au, zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 12, 6:30am, Geoff Wing wrote: } Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 } } We differ from other shells in that we have a clear workspace } under the prompt line. Apply [users/2973] and [...] } } My preference is for the current arrangement and I have } noalwayslastprompt - adding the patch may spawn another setopt } value: gimmeaclearworkspace :-) I'll play with this a bit when I'm wider awake, but: Can't you get the same effect with 2973 applied by having %E as the last thing in $PS1 ? And what's the point of having the %E escape if zsh is always going to clear the screen unconditionally? Just for "print -P"? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com