From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2124 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 16:22:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 16:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 26038 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2000 16:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10711 Received: (qmail 26007 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 16:22:03 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000412162149.ZM12506@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:21:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200004120910.LAA07597@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22" (Apr 12, 11:10am) References: <200004120910.LAA07597@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 12, 11:10am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 } } } Peter Stephenson wrote: } } > Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } > > So, I would like to make the question: should we remove it? } > } > If even the completion system as it is doesn't need it, I think it's a good } > bet that commenting out at this stage won't cause any problems. } } Here is the patch. Lotsa `#if's. I slightly disapprove of using `#if 0' when it's scattered around like that. Suppose we ever want to re-enable it: How does someone other than Sven know which `#if 0' to remove and which ones to leave behind? Not a big deal right now because there aren't any other #if in that file, but ... perhaps put a comment on each #if line? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com