From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18913 invoked from network); 3 May 2000 10:55:48 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 May 2000 10:55:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28645 invoked by alias); 3 May 2000 10:55:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11103 Received: (qmail 28618 invoked from network); 3 May 2000 10:55:33 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000503105524.ZM21494@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 10:55:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200005030716.JAA07455@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: Shell-word splitting (was: Re: Proposed _history completer)" (May 3, 9:16am) References: <200005030716.JAA07455@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Shell-word splitting (was: Re: Proposed _history completer) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 3, 9:16am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: Shell-word splitting (was: Re: Proposed _history completer) } } > Bart Schaefer wrote: } > } > > Hrm, again; maybe the way to do this is with a modifier rather than a } > > flag. :S is available, and it'd be kinda fun to be able to apply this } > > to history as well as to parameters. Or maybe it wouldn't ... } } I should have thought more about this yesterday... So should I, apparently. } Erm, the history modifier code only ever works on single words Right. Ah, well. I still think a modifier might be less confusing than a flag, particularly if we have to use a character like `=' for the flag, but ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com