From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5303 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 07:55:21 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 May 2000 07:55:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27059 invoked by alias); 12 May 2000 07:54:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11339 Received: (qmail 27033 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 07:54:55 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000512075440.ZM5036@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:54:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20000512045428.14179.qmail@web1303.mail.yahoo.com> Comments: In reply to Felix Rosencrantz "PATCH: Completion matching control test." (May 11, 9:54pm) References: <20000512045428.14179.qmail@web1303.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers Subject: Re: PATCH: Completion matching control test. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 11, 9:54pm, Felix Rosencrantz wrote: } Subject: PATCH: Completion matching control test. } } This patch is a proposed test for completion matching. I was able to } get this test to pass with my latest build of zsh. The test fails for me with the following output; I had to capture this with "make check >& file" because of the four carriage-returns in the last line of the diff: *** /tmp/zsh.ztst.out.4987 Fri May 12 00:27:35 2000 --- /tmp/zsh.ztst.tout.4987 Fri May 12 00:27:40 2000 *************** *** 1,2 **** line: {tst }{} ! COMPADD:{_tst:compadd: unknown match specification character `z'} --- 1,2 ---- line: {tst }{} ! COMPADD:{ _tst:compadd: unknown match specification character `z' } Test ../../zsh-3.1.6/Test/54compmatch.ztst failed: output differs from expected as shown above for: test_code z: list1 comptest -c "$code" $'tst \t' Was testing: Match Error for "z:" ../../zsh-3.1.6/Test/54compmatch.ztst: test failed. } Also, I'm using test 54, to come after the more generic completion test. I suppose that makes sense, but we've been talking about renumbering all the tests above 50 ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com