From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5837 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 09:17:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 May 2000 09:17:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 418 invoked by alias); 12 May 2000 09:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11343 Received: (qmail 336 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 09:17:04 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000512091659.ZM5110@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:16:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <0FUF00D90VFYFO@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Test (re)numbering" (May 12, 9:55am) References: <0FUF00D90VFYFO@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 12, 9:55am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Test (re)numbering } } Bart wrote } > I'd like to propose we renumber to the following numbering scheme: } } There's no world digit shortage; we could just use three-digit numbers Yes, and we probably should for 4.0 when we also massivly rename in the Completion subdirectories. I was aiming for minimal renaming for 3.1.7. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com