From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8068 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 14:50:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 May 2000 14:50:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 2681 invoked by alias); 12 May 2000 14:49:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11350 Received: (qmail 2660 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 14:49:38 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000512144929.ZM5633@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:49:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200005121433.QAA00724@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: PATCH: use of _arguments for hash" (May 12, 4:33pm) References: <200005121433.QAA00724@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: use of _arguments for hash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 12, 4:33pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: use of _arguments for hash } } Oliver Kiddle wrote: } } > Would it be useful to add a -L option to hash similar to alias -L? } } Seems reasonable, but personally I don't care much... What I've been wishing for is "zle -L". As far as I can tell there's no way to report what widgets are user-defined or what functions they call. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com