From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9353 invoked from network); 22 May 2000 00:51:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 May 2000 00:51:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7783 invoked by alias); 22 May 2000 00:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11482 Received: (qmail 7775 invoked from network); 22 May 2000 00:51:05 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000522005048.ZM11831@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 00:50:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Chmouel Boudjnah "Bugs in _arguments ?" (May 21, 3:27pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Chmouel Boudjnah , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Bugs in _arguments ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 21, 3:27pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: } Subject: Bugs in _arguments ? } } Maybe i missed something but _arguments don't do his job, thing like : } } rpm -ba --[tab] When I do that, I get: Completing `build', `spec file', `file', or `corrections' So somewhere else there is an argument spec for '-ba' that says the next argument can't be an option. ^X? is your friend; it indicates that the actual problem is in the `build_b' state in _rpm, and not in _arguments. However, I'm not up to trying to fix it at the moment ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com