From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3190 invoked from network); 25 May 2000 15:28:36 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 May 2000 15:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 6519 invoked by alias); 25 May 2000 15:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11581 Received: (qmail 6512 invoked from network); 25 May 2000 15:28:27 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000525152812.ZM3896@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:28:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200005250802.KAA32560@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: vared messes up tty state" (May 25, 10:02am) References: <200005250802.KAA32560@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: vared messes up tty state MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 25, 10:02am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: vared messes up tty state } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > Arguably, vared shouldn't even work in this condition (it behaves as } > if SINGLE_LINE_ZLE, when in fact ZLE is entirely disabled). } } I agree with this last one, so should we? I think so. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com