From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3590 invoked from network); 25 May 2000 16:02:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 May 2000 16:02:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10283 invoked by alias); 25 May 2000 16:02:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11584 Received: (qmail 10276 invoked from network); 25 May 2000 16:02:23 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000525160206.ZM7704@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:02:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200005240829.KAA23193@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior" (May 24, 10:29am) References: <200005240829.KAA23193@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 24, 10:29am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: Re: _rpm odd behavior } } [The patch] also adds the `-c'. Any other missing options anywhere? Depends on the version of rpm. `-c' may not be valid in the 2.x versions of rpm; there are some more that are valid in 3.x. I don't think we have a coherent scheme for dealing with revisions of the same command, do we? Mostly we just complete for the newest one we know about. I may take a look at _rpm later if no one else gets there first. But it may be tomorrow, so if someone else has time, don't wait for me. We could try to parse the output of "rpm --help"; but it's heirarchical, representing the modes selected by one of -q -e -U -b -t, so we'd still need to assist it a bit. I probably *won't* attempt that. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com