From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-11788-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 5245 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 05:56:35 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 05:56:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 10540 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2000 05:56:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 11788
Received: (qmail 10532 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 05:56:26 -0000
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <1000607055558.ZM7727@candle.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 05:55:58 +0000
In-Reply-To: <393CCB47.43BD74D7@u.genie.co.uk>
Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle <opk@u.genie.co.uk>
        "Re: zparseopts (Re: PATCH: _urls and _rpm)" (Jun  6, 10:58am)
References: <393C2510.5F7D3880@u.genie.co.uk> 
	<1000606040813.ZM25973@candle.brasslantern.com> 
	<393CCB47.43BD74D7@u.genie.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
To: Oliver Kiddle <opk@u.genie.co.uk>,
        Zsh workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: zparseopts (Re: PATCH: _urls and _rpm)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jun 6, 10:58am, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
} Subject: Re: zparseopts (Re: PATCH: _urls and _rpm)
}
} On the subject of my IRIX 5.3 compilation warnings, Bart Schaefer wrote:
} > What does line 111 of sys/types.h look like?
} 
} typedef unsigned long   ino_t;          /* <inode> type */
} 
} If you look back it my previous message (11755), you'll see that I had
} stuck a section of types.h in at the end.

Oops, I thought that was part of the diff and never even looked at it.

} after a preprocessor check for _MIPS_SZLONG == 32.

Where does _MIPS_SZLONG come from?

The test for ino_t passes this:

#include "confdefs.h"
#include <sys/types.h>
#if STDC_HEADERS
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#endif

through the preprocessor and then egreps to find ino_t.  From the snippet
you sent, the egrep should fail only if _MIPS_SZLONG is neither 32 nor 64.
Unless IRIX's egrep is broken, which is not impossible ...

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net